Here is a comprehensive explanation of the HRM (Human Resource Management) structure, covering its evolution, common models, and key components, presented in a clear, structured manner.
HRM Structure: An Overview
An HRM structure refers to the organization of the Human Resources function within a company. It defines how HR responsibilities are distributed, how the HR team is organized, and how it delivers services to the business, managers, and employees. The goal of a well-designed structure is to align HR services with the strategic objectives of the organization efficiently and effectively.
The Evolution of HR Structures: The “Three-Legged Stool” Model
The most influential modern HR structure is the HR Business Partner (HRBP) model, often visualized as a “Three-Legged Stool.” Developed by Dave Ulrich in the 1990s, this model aims to make HR more strategic and efficient by separating its key functions.
| Leg of the Stool | Primary Focus | Key Activities | Analogy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shared Services Center (SSC) (Operational & Administrative) | Efficiency & Standardization | – Payroll & benefits administration – Employee data management – HR inquiries & helpdesk – Onboarding paperwork – Policy administration | The Foundation: Handles routine, transactional tasks for all employees. Often uses a portal or call center. |
| 2. Centers of Excellence (COE) (Specialist & Design) | Expertise & Innovation | – Talent Acquisition (Recruitment) – Learning & Development (L&D) – Compensation & Benefits (C&B) – Employee Relations (ER) – HR Analytics | The Experts: Deep specialists who design programs, policies, and strategies in specific HR domains. |
| 3. HR Business Partners (HRBP) (Strategic & Consultative) | Business Alignment | – Strategic consulting with business leaders – Organizational design – Change management – Talent management – Interpreting HR data for the business unit | The Strategists: Embedded in business units, they translate business needs into HR priorities and leverage the COEs and SSC. |
How it works: An employee has a pay issue (SSC). A manager needs a new sales compensation plan designed (COE). A business leader is planning a restructuring (HRBP). Each “leg” handles a different type of need.
Common Types of Organizational HR Structures
The Ulrich model is implemented differently depending on the company’s size, geography, and needs. Here are the most common structural types:
1. Centralized Structure
- Description: All HR staff report to a single, top HR leader at corporate headquarters. Policies, processes, and decisions are standardized across the entire organization.
- Best For: Small to mid-sized companies, or those with a single location.
- Pros: Consistency, cost control, clear chain of command.
- Cons: Can be slow to respond to local needs, may feel bureaucratic.
2. Decentralized Structure
- Description: HR professionals are embedded in and report directly to individual business units, divisions, or geographic regions (with a “dotted line” to corporate HR).
- Best For: Large, diversified multinational corporations (MNCs).
- Pros: Highly responsive to local/business unit needs, deep understanding of specific markets.
- Cons: Inconsistency, higher costs, potential for duplication of efforts.
3. Hybrid (Matrix) Structure
- Description: This is the most common implementation of the Ulrich model. HRBPs report to their business unit leader (solid line) but also have a functional reporting line to the corporate HR head (dotted line). COEs and SSC are typically centralized.
- Best For: Most large and global organizations.
- Pros: Balances global consistency with local flexibility, enables strategic partnership.
- Cons: Can create complex reporting relationships and potential conflict of priorities.
Key Components of an HR Department Structure (Roles & Responsibilities)
Regardless of the overall model, an HR department is typically composed of these key roles or teams:
| HR Component | Key Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| HR Leadership (CHRO, VP of HR) | Sets the overall HR strategy, aligns it with business goals, leads the HR function, and reports to the CEO. |
| Talent Acquisition (TA) / Recruiting | Sourcing, recruiting, interviewing, and hiring new employees. Employer branding. |
| Learning & Development (L&D) | Employee training, leadership development, competency modeling, and managing development programs. |
| Compensation & Benefits (C&B) | Designing salary structures, bonus plans, health insurance, retirement plans, and conducting market surveys. |
| Employee Relations (ER) | Handling workplace conflict, disciplinary actions, grievance procedures, and ensuring fair treatment. |
| HR Operations & Analytics | Managing HRIS (Human Resource Information System), payroll, data integrity, reporting, and HR analytics. |
| HR Business Partners (HRBP) | Acting as strategic consultants to business leaders on people-related matters (as described above). |
Sample HR Structure Visualization (for a Mid-to-Large Sized Company)
Here is a typical hybrid structure for a company with multiple business units:
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
|
Chief HR Officer (CHRO)
|
--------------------------------------------
| | |
HR Operations & Centers of Excellence HR Business Partners
Shared Services (COEs) (HRBPs)
| | |
- Payroll - Talent Acquisition - HRBP for Division A
- HRIS (System) - Learning & Dev - HRBP for Division B
- Benefits Admin - Compensation & Benefits - HRBP for Sales
- Helpdesk - Employee Relations - HRBP for R&DSummary: Choosing the Right Structure
There is no one-size-fits-all model. The right HR structure depends on:
- Company Size: Startups might have one HR generalist, while global firms need a complex hybrid model.
- Business Strategy: A company focused on innovation may invest heavily in L&D and Talent Management COEs.
- Geographical Dispersion: Global companies often use a hybrid/matrix structure to balance global and local needs.
- Company Culture: A decentralized structure may fit a culture of autonomy, while a centralized one fits a command-and-control culture.
The ultimate goal of any HRM structure is to move the HR function from a purely administrative role to a strategic partner that drives business success through effective people management.